The Specification Design Pattern in C#: What You Need To Know

Software engineering is an ever-evolving field, and that means new patterns will emerge. These design patterns have helped software engineers to simplify their coding processes and achieve better outcomes in less time. One such pattern is Specification Design Pattern — and in this article, we’ll be looking at the Specification Design Pattern in C#

The Specification Design Pattern is a software design pattern that allows developers to create reusable, composable, and extensible specifications that can be used to select objects from a collection based on business rules. This pattern is useful for validating complex business rules and filtering objects from large collections in a clean and concise way. By implementing the Specification Design Pattern, software engineers can improve the readability, maintainability, and scalability of their code.

In this guide, I’ll explain the Specification Design Pattern in depth. I’ll cover the benefits of this pattern, its drawbacks, and provide guidelines for implementing the Specification Design Pattern using the C# programming language. I’ll also share best practices for using the pattern and avoiding common mistakes. By the end of this article, you’ll be able to leverage the Specification Design Pattern and apply it to your software engineering projects!

Let’s go!

What’s In This Article: The Specification Design Pattern in C#

Check out my content on other platforms:

Understanding Specification Design Pattern

The Specification Design Pattern is a design pattern that is used to enable programmers to separate the logic for the evaluation of a specific condition from the program’s primary logic. This pattern offers developers a standardized way to define criteria that can be used to execute specific actions in a program, without cluttering up the main logic of the code.

Benefits of the Specification Design Pattern

There are many benefits to using Specification Design Pattern, including:

• Improved maintainability: With this pattern, you can encapsulate the business logic within the specifications. This helps with maintaining the code as there is a single place for modification, debugging, and testing.
• Simplified coding: This pattern may allow for more straightforward coding by enabling you to separate concerns between the main program logic and the evaluation of specific conditions, as well as criteria.
• Increased versatility: The Specification Design Pattern enables the extension of business rules without the need for modification of the existing application logic.

It’s important to keep in mind that every design pattern has pros and cons. Understanding the benefits of the Specification Design Pattern can help you find opportunities where it may be beneficial.

Drawbacks of the Specification Design Pattern

And everything that has pros… has cons too! Here are some drawbacks to using the Specification Design Pattern:

• Increased complexity: The increase in the number of classes may make the code harder to understand than other approaches that achieve the same results with fewer classes.
• Decreased performance: Using Specification Design Pattern may negatively impact performance in cases where many instances of it need to execute at runtime. This is largely dependent on the implementation and number of specifications.

One way to mitigate the drawbacks of Specification Design Pattern is by creating reusable specifications. Doing so enables you to ensure that specifications can be combined and reused, without needing to focus on their implementation details.

Implementing Specification Design Pattern in C#

To begin implementing the Specification Design Pattern in C#, we need to first understand the different components of the pattern. These components will be the:

• Specification Interface: The API of the specifications we’d like to code against.
• Specification Class: The implementations of the specifications

Creating a Specification Interface

The Specification Interface is used to create reusable and composable specifications. It defines the contract that is required for all specifications. Below is an example of a specification interface in C#:

public interface ISpecification<T>
{
   bool IsSatisfiedBy(T entity);
}

The interface is a “generic”, parameterized over a type T, which in our case can represent any entity in the domain that we want to verify against specifications. The IsSatisfiedBy method checks whether a given entity satisfies the specification or not.

Creating Specification Classes

Specification Classes are classes that implement the Specification Interface. These classes define the actual specifications that are used to evaluate the entity. This is where our logic and implementations will live.

Here’s an example of how we can implement a Specification Class for Customer entities to filter by date of birth:

public class CustomerByDateOfBirthSpecification : ISpecification<Customer>
{
    private readonly DateTime _dateOfBirth;

    public CustomerByDateOfBirthSpecification(DateTime dateOfBirth)
    {
        _dateOfBirth = dateOfBirth;
    }

    public bool IsSatisfiedBy(Customer entity)
    {
        return entity.DateOfBirth == _dateOfBirth;
    }
}

As shown in the example above, the constructor for the CustomerByDateOfBirthSpecification class receives the date of birth as a parameter. When the IsSatisfiedBy method is called, it evaluates whether an instance of the Customer class satisfies the specification or not based on their date of birth.

Testing Specification Classes

After these classes have been created, it’s important to test them to ensure they are functioning as expected.

Here is an example of how to test a specification class with something like NUnit:

[TestFixture]
public class CustomerByDateOfBirthSpecificationTest
{
    private IReadOnlyList<Customer> _customers;

    [SetUp]
    public void SetUp()
    {
        _customers = new List<Customer>
        {
            new Customer { DateOfBirth = new DateTime(1992, 3, 17) },
            new Customer { DateOfBirth = new DateTime(1990, 11, 28) },
            new Customer { DateOfBirth = new DateTime(1995, 10, 5) }
        };
    }

    [Test]
    public void Should_ReturnTrue_When_CustomerMatchesSpecification()
    {
        // Arrange
        CustomerByDateOfBirthSpecification specification = new(new DateTime(1990, 11, 28));
        var customer = _customers[1];

        // Act
        var result = specification.IsSatisfiedBy(customer);

        // Assert
        Assert.IsTrue(result);
    }

    [Test]
    public void Should_ReturnFalse_When_CustomerDoesNotMatchSpecification()
    {
        // Arrange
        var specification = new CustomerByDateOfBirthSpecification(new DateTime(1993, 1, 1));
        var customer = _customers[2];

        // Act
        var result = specification.IsSatisfiedBy(customer);

        // Assert
        Assert.IsFalse(result);
    }
}

As we can see, we first set up a list of Customer entities. Then, we create instances of our specification class and test them using different customers and expected results. These tests ensure that our specification classes work correctly and reliably.

Now that we have covered how to implement and test the Specification Design Pattern, we can move on to discussing best practices to maximize the pattern’s effectiveness.

Best Practices for Using Specification Design Pattern in C#

When using Specification Design Pattern in C#, it’s important to follow certain best practices to use the pattern effectively and efficiently.

Integrate Specification Design Pattern into Existing Codebases

To integrate the Specification Design Pattern into your existing codebase, it’s important determine what concerns the pattern addresses and identify the most suitable candidates for specification. Once you have done this, you can extract the existing logic for specific conditions and create a separate specification class. In doing so, you ensure that the main logic of the code doesn’t get cluttered and remains easy to maintain.

Remember to factor in the drawbacks of this design pattern as well — If you are concerned about multiple small classes cluttering your code base, keep this in mind. Personally, I like having logic split out this way but it may feel overkill in your situation.

Compose Specifications Effectively

One of the most important benefits of the Specification Design Pattern is that it’s composable. This means that you can combine multiple specification classes into a single one. And the keyword here we’re talking about is composition — Keep your inheritance out of this!

Ensure that you implement composition carefully though, especially where large compositions are involved. Doing so will ensure that you don’t create any complex scenarios that could negatively impact the performance of the pattern.

Reuse Specifications in Your Code

One of the significant benefits of the Specification Design Pattern is that specifications are reusable in different parts of the program, irrespective of business logic. To do this effectively, it may be helpful to store specification classes in a separate library that’s accessible from any part of the application. Reusing specifications this way enables you to remove duplicated code, write cleaner code, and focus on the primary function of your application. This will be situational and dependent on your opinion, of course.

Below is an example of how to compose two specifications in a single specification class in C#:

public class CustomerIsVipAndFromUsaSpecification : ISpecification<Customer>
{
    private readonly ISpecification<Customer> _isVip;
    private readonly ISpecification<Customer> _isFromUSA;

    public CustomerIsVipAndFromUsaSpecification(
        ISpecification<Customer> isVip, 
        ISpecification<Customer> isFromUSA)
    {
        _isVip = isVip;
        _isFromUSA = isFromUSA;
    }

    public IsSatisfiedBy(Customer entity)
    {
        return
            _isVip.IsSatisfiedBy(entity) &&
            _isFromUSA.IsSatisfiedBy(entity);
    }
}

In the example above, we create a new specification that represents customers who are VIP and are from the USA by composing two specifications into a single one. The constructor of the CustomerIsVipAndFromUsaSpecification takes two specifications, _isVip and _isFromUSA to compose the new implementation. By taking this approach, we can combine multiple specifications… Even doing this in a generic way!

Using these best practices when implementing Specification Design Pattern in C# will make your code more efficient, easier to maintain, less error-prone, and scalable.

Wrapping up the Specification Design Pattern in C#

In this article, we explored the Specification Design Pattern in C# and how it can be used to improve code quality and maintainability. I shared the benefits of the pattern, such as its ability to abstract complex queries and improve testability, as well as its drawbacks, such as the need to create additional code and the potential for decreased performance.

I also provided guidance on how to implement the pattern effectively in C#, including creating a specification interface, creating specification classes, and testing the code. Best practices were discussed to help you use the pattern effectively and avoid common mistakes. Remember — don’t overdo it and remain pragmatic with your approach!

By using this design pattern, you can easily add new functionality to your codebase without fear of breaking existing code, helping your code become more maintainable and easier to read. If you’re interested in more learning opportunities, subscribe to my free weekly newsletter and check out my YouTube channel!

Frequently Asked Questions: The Specification Design Pattern in C#

Nick Cosentino Principal Software Engineering Manager

Principal Software Engineering Manager at Microsoft. Views are my own.

See Full Bio

ASP.NET C# DotNet .NET Software Engineering